GCHQ - heart of big brother?
In
1990 the Berlin Wall came down. One of the outcomes was the
facilitation of citizens of the bankrupt GDR to have access to secret
files kept on them by the hated Stasi, the Ministry
for State Security.
The Stasi has been described as one of the most effective and
repressive secret intelligence services in the history of the world.
protesters against the Stasi in East Berlin
When
people accessed files on themselves they discovered that even some family members had
spied on them for rewards such as moving up the waiting list for
housing or a new “cardboard car”, the Trabant. It might be said
that the GDR government, with its KGB association and support, has
done much to dirty the good name of socialism. The spying on
“ordinary citizens” by their fellows extended to reporting them
for illegal political meetings and action that could be described as
political dissent of any kind.
The
tendency of governments to lie about their worst excesses has never
been more apparent. During New labour's term of office Jack
Straw (Home Secretary) categorically denied UK involvement with
rendering. This is the practise of kidnapping individuals and housing
them in friendly countries such as Turkey with out recourse to legal
representation. Straw vehemently denied accusations of UK involvement
with the torture of these political prisoners in the name of anti
terrorist security policy. Turkey has more imprisoned journalist than
any government in the world. It has since become clear the UK
involvement was rife with co-operation with the CIA who were the
biggest player in the practise of rendering.

Edward
Snowdon the man responsible for leaking the latest revelations around
American
Prism
spying
on it's citizens is in hiding in Hong Kong. He
used the name VERAX meaning
truth-teller in Latin, in his communications with the Washington
Post.
He
said he earned 200,000 dollars a year for his work as a CIA employee
but leaked the Prism information "because there are more important
things than money". This is another example of a whistle blower who will
probably pay dearly for his revelations like Bradley Manning the
American army intelligence officer.
When Obama spoke about the leaked information yesterday he stumbled and stammered uncomfortably like any common place liar. Another politician who puts political expediency before the truth. This is the man who vowed he would dismantle Guantanamo Bay prison, the practise of keeping alleged terrorists with out trial and water boarding the American's favourite form of torture.
As
I write this I am listening, on the radio, to the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, making a statement in the House
of Commons in Westminster. He denies all improper use of spy ware
used to spy on “ordinary citizens” but, why should we believe
him? I do not believe this governments assertions on much at all and
the Prism scandal is no exception. This is the man who only a few days ago apologised for the torture and murder of suspected Mau Mau terrorists during Britain's rule in Kenya back in the bad old days of Empire. This was denied by successive UK governments for years. I repeat why should we believe him now or at any time?
When
I was “kettled” during the Westminster square demo against
student loans cuts the police took photographs of every one leaving
after we had been held on Westminster bridge for two hours after five hours being "kettled" in Westminster Square. It is
technically illegal to take photographs of a police officer. We were,
for the most part, UK citizens demonstrating in a peaceful manner.
What were they afraid of?
Regulation
of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act, passed by New Labour in 2000,
allows our own security agencies to gather information about people's
phone calls and peruse our web-surfing histories. The RIP Act is an
extraordinary piece of legislation. It restricts the right of private
companies and individuals (including journalists) to hack into
people's data and baldly decrees that only the state and its trusted
offshoots shall have such powers of intimate hackery. It allows
agencies(including
Defence Intelligence Staff, MI6, MI5 and Her Majesty's Revenue and
Custom) to intercept our communications, including tapping our
telephones, getting access to our emails and checking our
web-browsing
antics. It
also allows "lower level" forms of spying, or what it calls
"directed surveillance", and this power can be invoked by
all the security agencies as well as local councils, the Office of
Fair Trading, the Serious Fraud Office and others. Local councils
have used the RIP Act to spend loads of public money on buying zoom
binoculars, night-vision goggles and GPS tracking devices, which they
have used to snoop on our telephones and access our emails.The RIP
Act gave Britain what were then unprecedented
powers of internet spying. It gave rise to a new institution, called
the Government Technical Assistance Centre, which can carry out
surveillance of the email messages held by ISPs. The aim of the RIP
Act is as simple as it is terrifying – to allow the authorities, in
the words of a Home Office official, to “ obtain a picture of a
persons life, activities and associates”.
The
increased surveillance of our every move has reached almost total
saturation. Cookies on web sites provide information on our
purchasing habits and a lot more. It was recently discovered that
when Sony BMG hid a “rootkit” on their CDs, they spied on you the
music lover and let hackers into your computer. What were they
thinking?
It
is not possible to travel any where with out our every move being
recorded on CTV cameras and through banking card transactions. We often hear the assertion that if we have
nothing to hide then we have no reason to be concerned. This was an
assertion often heard in the early days of The Third Reich which
heralded the full blown horrors of the Nazi regime in Germany. The
culture of a any government spying policy directed at what the
government call “ordinary citizens” will lead to a decline in transparent political standards and values and a relaxing of political moral practise. It will be increasingly
easier to by pass the usual protocols that are designed to protect us
from state intrusions into our private lives and the price will be
high.
Privacy
as we knew it began to decline some time in the 20th
Century and we see that the continued erosion is almost complete. For
some time George Orwell's idea that one day the state would remove
all personal privacy appeared to be mistaken. In fact it was more the
case that we were watching Big Brother and it's propaganda on
television. This is no longer the case. Big Brother is more than
likely watching YOU in spite of protestations that this not the case.
So, is Edward Snowdon a traitor or a hero? Do you accept what William Hague has said about GCHQ and the Prism affair? Do you believe that this government will act responsibly over surveillance of suspected criminals or terrorists and not extend their surveillance to ordinary citizens who democratically oppose their policies?
peace